The prospect of Donald Trump being re-elected as President of the United States in 2024 presents a significant pivot in global politics, impacting major geopolitical theatres such as Ukraine, the Middle East, and China. This analysis will delve into the potential outcomes and shifts in these regions under a second Trump administration.

Ukraine
Historical Context

During Trump’s first term, his administration’s stance towards Ukraine was characterized by ambivalence. While Trump approved lethal aid to Ukraine in the form of Javelin anti-tank missiles, his administration was also embroiled in controversy regarding his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which led to his first impeachment.

Potential Outcomes
  1. Reduced Military Support: Trump has often criticized extensive U.S. military aid to foreign countries, suggesting a preference for reducing U.S. involvement abroad. This could mean a significant decrease in military support for Ukraine, weakening its position against Russian aggression.
  2. Diplomatic Negotiations with Russia: Trump’s known admiration for Vladimir Putin might lead to renewed efforts to negotiate directly with Russia. This could result in compromises unfavorable to Ukraine, potentially forcing Kyiv to concede more territory or autonomy to Russian-backed separatists.
  3. Impact on NATO: Trump has been vocal about NATO allies increasing their defense spending. A second term could intensify this pressure, potentially straining the alliance. European allies might feel compelled to take a more independent stance on Ukraine, leading to a less coordinated Western response to Russian actions.
Middle East
Historical Context

Trump’s first term saw significant developments in the Middle East, including the withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, the assassination of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, and the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab states.

Potential Outcomes
  1. Iran: Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran could resume with even greater intensity. This might include re-imposing severe economic sanctions, potentially leading to further destabilization within Iran and escalating tensions in the region. A possible military confrontation cannot be ruled out if Iran resumes its nuclear ambitions.
  2. Israel and Palestine: Trump’s administration was marked by strong support for Israel, including the recognition of Jerusalem as its capital. A second term could see continued or increased support for Israeli policies, potentially leading to further marginalization of Palestinian claims and exacerbating tensions in the region.
  3. Arab States: The Abraham Accords might see further expansion, with more Arab states normalizing relations with Israel. This could lead to a realignment of regional alliances, isolating Iran and its proxies. However, the internal stability of these new alliances could be tested by popular discontent or shifts in leadership.
  4. U.S. Military Presence: Trump’s inclination towards reducing U.S. military presence abroad might lead to further withdrawals from Iraq and Syria. This could create power vacuums potentially filled by extremist groups or influence from Russia and Iran.
China
Historical Context

Trump’s first term was marked by an intense trade war with China, aiming to reduce the U.S. trade deficit and challenge China’s trade practices. His administration also took a strong stance on issues like intellectual property theft and China’s growing influence in international organizations.

Potential Outcomes
  1. Trade Relations: Trump is likely to resume or intensify trade confrontations with China, possibly re-imposing tariffs and negotiating for more favorable trade terms. This could lead to increased economic tensions, affecting global markets and supply chains.
  2. Technology and Espionage: Under Trump, the U.S. took significant steps to counter Chinese technology companies like Huawei, citing security concerns. A second term could see further restrictions on Chinese tech firms and heightened scrutiny of Chinese students and researchers in the U.S., impacting technological collaboration and innovation.
  3. Taiwan: Trump’s administration made significant arms sales to Taiwan and increased diplomatic interactions. A second term could see even stronger support for Taiwan, risking severe reactions from China, which considers Taiwan a breakaway province. This could lead to heightened military tensions in the Taiwan Strait.
  4. South China Sea: Trump’s assertive Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPs) in the South China Sea could continue, challenging China’s territorial claims and increasing the potential for maritime conflicts. This might lead to greater involvement of regional allies like Japan and Australia in countering Chinese influence.
Broader Implications
Global Economy

Trump’s economic policies, particularly trade confrontations and protectionist measures, could lead to significant disruptions in the global economy. Increased tariffs on Chinese goods, coupled with potential economic sanctions on countries like Iran, could lead to market volatility and impact global supply chains. Allies and adversaries alike might seek to recalibrate their economic strategies, possibly reducing dependency on U.S. markets.

International Alliances

Trump’s transactional approach to alliances could strain traditional partnerships. NATO could face further challenges as member states are pressured to increase defense spending or face reduced U.S. support. In Asia, alliances with Japan, South Korea, and Australia might be tested by the administration’s demands for greater burden-sharing. Meanwhile, countries in the Middle East could see shifting alliances based on the U.S. stance towards Iran and support for Israel.

Multilateral Organizations

Trump’s skepticism towards multilateral organizations like the United Nations and the World Health Organization could lead to decreased U.S. participation and funding. This might weaken these organizations’ ability to respond to global challenges such as pandemics, climate change, and international conflicts. Other major powers, particularly China, could seize the opportunity to increase their influence within these organizations.

Domestic Considerations

Trump’s domestic policies will inevitably impact his foreign policy decisions. A focus on “America First” might lead to policies aimed at boosting domestic industries at the expense of international trade agreements. Domestic political considerations, such as appealing to his base, might drive foreign policy decisions that prioritize short-term political gains over long-term strategic interests.

Conclusion

A second Trump presidency is likely to bring significant changes to global politics, particularly in key theatres like Ukraine, the Middle East, and China. His approach, characterized by a preference for unilateral actions, direct negotiations, and a focus on American interests, could lead to major shifts in international alliances and economic strategies.

In Ukraine, a potential reduction in U.S. support could weaken Kyiv’s position against Russia, while in the Middle East, a renewed maximum pressure campaign on Iran could destabilize the region further. In China, increased economic and military tensions are likely, with significant implications for global trade and security.

Overall, the global political landscape under a second Trump administration would be marked by increased uncertainty and volatility, with far-reaching consequences for international relations and global stability.


Impact of a Trump Presidency on Africa
Historical Context

During his first term, Trump’s engagement with Africa was often characterized by a transactional approach. The administration focused on countering Chinese influence, promoting U.S. economic interests, and addressing security concerns related to terrorism. However, Trump’s controversial remarks about some African countries and a perceived lack of substantive policy initiatives created an atmosphere of uncertainty regarding U.S.-Africa relations.

Potential Outcomes
  1. Economic Relations: Trump’s preference for bilateral trade deals over multilateral agreements could lead to renegotiations of existing trade agreements, such as the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). This might result in more favorable terms for the U.S. but could create economic disruptions for African countries reliant on access to U.S. markets.
  2. Chinese Influence: A second Trump term would likely intensify efforts to counter Chinese influence in Africa. This could involve increased U.S. investment in infrastructure projects, as seen with the Prosper Africa initiative. However, the competition might also strain relationships with African countries that have strong economic ties with China.
  3. Security and Counterterrorism: Trump’s administration placed significant emphasis on combating terrorism in Africa, particularly in regions affected by groups like Boko Haram and Al-Shabaab. A continuation of this focus could mean sustained or increased military aid and cooperation with African nations. However, there might also be a push for these countries to take on more of the financial burden.
  4. Aid and Development: Trump’s first term saw proposals to cut foreign aid, including to African nations. A second term could bring further reductions in aid, potentially impacting health, education, and development programs. This might force African countries to seek alternative sources of funding, possibly increasing reliance on China and other non-Western nations.
  5. Diplomatic Engagement: The administration’s diplomatic engagement with Africa was limited compared to previous administrations. A second term might see a continuation of this trend, with fewer high-level visits and less emphasis on diplomatic relations. This could lead to a perception of neglect and decrease U.S. influence on the continent.
Impact of a Trump Presidency on South America
Historical Context

Trump’s first term saw a complex relationship with South America, characterized by a strong focus on immigration, trade, and addressing the political and economic crisis in Venezuela. The administration’s policies were often viewed as assertive and interventionist, with a strong emphasis on protecting U.S. interests.

Potential Outcomes
  1. Immigration and Border Security: Trump’s tough stance on immigration significantly impacted relations with South American countries. A second term would likely continue this approach, with increased border security measures and stricter immigration policies. This could strain relations with countries like Mexico and Central American nations, potentially leading to diplomatic tensions.
  2. Trade Agreements: Trump’s administration renegotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), resulting in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). A second term might see similar efforts to renegotiate trade agreements with South American countries, aiming for more favorable terms for the U.S. This could create economic uncertainties for these countries, particularly those heavily reliant on trade with the U.S.
  3. Venezuela Crisis: Trump took a hardline stance against the Maduro regime in Venezuela, supporting opposition leader Juan Guaidó and imposing severe economic sanctions. A second term would likely continue this approach, potentially increasing pressure on the regime. However, this could also exacerbate the humanitarian crisis and lead to greater regional instability.
  4. Countering Chinese Influence: Like in Africa, Trump’s administration sought to counter Chinese influence in South America. A second term might see increased efforts to promote U.S. economic and diplomatic presence in the region, encouraging South American countries to reduce their reliance on Chinese investment. This could involve enhanced economic aid, infrastructure projects, and trade initiatives.
  5. Drug Trafficking and Organized Crime: Trump’s focus on combating drug trafficking and organized crime in South America was a significant aspect of his first term. A second term could see continued or intensified efforts in this area, with increased military and law enforcement cooperation with South American nations. This might involve additional funding and resources but could also lead to greater U.S. involvement in regional security issues.
  6. Environmental Policies: Trump’s administration faced criticism for its stance on environmental issues, including withdrawing from the Paris Agreement. A second term might continue to prioritize economic development over environmental concerns, potentially leading to conflicts with South American countries that are highly vulnerable to climate change impacts. This could affect cooperation on environmental initiatives and sustainability projects.
Broader Implications for Africa and South America
Global Influence

Trump’s transactional and America-first approach to foreign policy could lead to a perception of the U.S. as an unreliable partner in both Africa and South America. This might encourage countries in these regions to diversify their international partnerships, seeking closer ties with China, Russia, and other emerging powers.

Economic Diversification

Countries in Africa and South America might accelerate efforts to diversify their economies and reduce dependency on U.S. markets. This could involve seeking new trade agreements, fostering regional integration, and investing in sectors such as technology, agriculture, and renewable energy.

Political Stability

U.S. policies under Trump could have mixed impacts on political stability in Africa and South America. While support for counterterrorism and anti-crime efforts might enhance security, reduced aid and diplomatic engagement could undermine development and governance initiatives. This could lead to increased instability and potential for conflict in some regions.

Public Perception

The perception of U.S. policies in Africa and South America under Trump’s second term would likely be shaped by a mix of skepticism and pragmatism. While some leaders might welcome the emphasis on bilateral deals and economic opportunities, others could view the administration’s approach as self-serving and lacking in genuine partnership.

Conclusion

A second Trump presidency would have significant implications for Africa and South America, influencing economic relations, security dynamics, and diplomatic engagement. While there might be opportunities for increased U.S. investment and cooperation in certain areas, the overall impact could be characterized by increased uncertainty and a shift towards more transactional relationships. Countries in these regions would need to navigate a complex landscape, balancing their interactions with the U.S. while exploring alternative partnerships and strategies for economic and political stability.

Avatar photo

By Wilson B. James

South African Political Analyst & Author